Madonna in distress: the new planetary portrait

Screen Shot 2015-01-15 at 21.27.33

Madonna Litta, Leonardo da Vinci

Mother Earth has a never-before-seen portrait now on show, thanks to three pieces of planetary-scale research published this week.

Together they paint the most up-to-date image yet of our planetary home – along with the extreme demands that we, her most demanding offspring, are making of her.

So what does this most modern of mother-and-child portraits look like?

In one way, it’s a twist on Leonardo’s Madonna Litta, with its knowing baby gorging himself on his mother’s milk. But in the new planetary version of this image, the infant’s excessive demands have left Mother Earth far from serene.

So here’s that scientific portrait, in three broad brush strokes.

  1. The dominant child. We humans became the biggest driving force of Earth-system change back around 1950. Just as Bing Crosby and Nat King Cole topped the music charts, we were entering the Anthropocene – the epoch of Earth’s history in which humanity is the biggest driver of change at the Earth-system scale. Why around then? According to the team of experts brought together to propose the date, it’s the arrival of carbon isotopes from nuclear weapons, along with a thin layer of plastic litter on Earth’ s surface at that time which should mark the defining shift. So we’re likely to go down in history as the ones who smeared the planet with nuclear fallout and plastic debris: that is unlikely to impress far-future generations.
Screen Shot 2015-01-15 at 23.45.29

Hiroshima, 6 August 1945. The Anthropocene had begun.

2. Growing pains. Since 1950 we have driven a Great Acceleration in our consumption of Earth’s resources, with accompanying ecological impactResearch by Will Steffen and colleagues has documented the unprecedented exponential increase in human consumption that kicked off around 1950 – from international flights, cars and energy to paper, water and fertilizer – along with a rapid increase in ecological degradation, from tropical forest loss to ocean acidification. “It is difficult to overestimate the scale and speed of change”, says Steffen, “In a single lifetime, humanity has become a planetary-scale geological force.”

Screen Shot 2015-01-15 at 21.08.47

  1. Out of our mother’s arms. Thanks to this intense pressure on the planet, we have now crossed beyond the safety zones of four planetary boundaries. A just-released update of the planetary boundaries framework by Will Steffen, Johan Rockstrom and colleagues – six years on from its initial publication – indicates that we have pushed ourselves over the boundary on climate change, biosphere integrity, land-system change, and phosphorus and nitrogen use, putting ourselves beyond a Holocene-like planetary state and hence into a danger zone. “Transgressing a boundary”, says lead author Steffen, “increases the risk that human activities could inadvertently drive the Earth System into a much less hospitable state, damaging efforts to reduce poverty and leading to a deterioration of human wellbeing in many parts of the world, including wealthy countries.”

Screen Shot 2015-01-15 at 20.29.37

There is already critique of the new planetary boundary analysis, put forward by some of its long-standing critics associated with the Breakthrough Institute (but this should hardly be a surprise: what else was going to happen when the Breakthrough Gang bumped into the Boundary Gang?). The Breakthrough authors, Erle Ellis and colleagues, argue that, “Contrary to the authors’ claim that the Holocene is the ‘only state of the planet that we know for certain can support contemporary human societies’, the human-altered ecosystems of the Anthropocene represent the only state of the planet that we know for certain can support contemporary civilization.”

It’s a challenge that risks pitching a false battle over who makes the best mum to 21st century humanity: the Holocene or the Anthropocene? I’d say neither of those two mothers, as they are defined.

This century we should be seeking to create a world in which we can collectively provide the food, water, energy, shelter, and other essential needs to meet the human rights of up to 10 billion people, and do so without disrupting the planetary life-support systems – a stable climate, fertile soils, thriving biodiversity, ample freshwater, a protective ozone layer – on which our well-being also depends.

That world lies in neither a pristine Holocene nor a boundary-busting Anthropocene. Rather, it is to be found in the uneasy lovechild of the two. And that’s the doughnut: the space that lies between social boundaries and planetary boundaries.


The Doughnut: lovechild of the Holocene and the Anthropocene, Raworth (2012)

Why the doughnut? Because we have to put some pressure on the planet to meet our human rights – but not so much that we undermine the very life-support systems that Earth provides. It’s a question of balancing skillfully in the space that lies between these two fundamental sources of our wellbeing.

And since it is all about balance, then perhaps this image makes a more aspirational and suitable Madonna-and-child portrait for the 21st century. Don’t be fooled, though: this balancing act will be far from easy to achieve and maintain, so we have a good way to go before we can start smiling about it.

Screen Shot 2015-01-16 at 00.12.15

Image: John Slater

10 thoughts on “Madonna in distress: the new planetary portrait

  1. 16 January 2015 at 12:02

    Hi Kate, Could not agree more! Perfect piece of reading.
    Omnia in omnibus &
    Singula in singulis
    (all things exist in all things &
    all individuals exist in all individuals)

    Our system dynamics are in need for innovative transformations:
    and from CONTROL TO SUPPORT.

    This piece helps me and I hope you will agree upon letting us use as a link to our work:

    e-Transferium is an activation strategy for cooperation with the ability to sustain and face those challenges!


    for more info. Regards Frans

    1. 16 January 2015 at 15:10

      Frans, you are most welcome.

      1. 16 January 2015 at 21:58

        Thanks Kate for your quick repsonse. I’ll try and send some info via email. Frans

  2. Sarah Cornell
    16 January 2015 at 13:45

    Kate, you play an absolutely essential role in keeping humanity at the heart of the planetary boundaries concept. Big, big thanks for this piece – warmly human and still challengingly though-provoking.

  3. 16 January 2015 at 19:06

    Kate, I have only just recently subscribed to your Blog posts having seen your TED-x talk. I have an interest in local economic development as a consequence of being part of a large Rural County North of England Local Authority Economic Policy team that was contributing to the research base for a new Spatial/Economic Strategy. In time it became clear to me that the premise for our work was seriously flawed (a growth model based on massive economic regeneration created by building thousands of new houses on mainly greenfield land and all of the associated hard resource-heavy infrastructure to support this) and so I left this work in 2010 to explore alternative approaches via the REconomy Project that was being developed by the Transition Movement. I am now adding and applying this knowledge and experience to studying and using permaculture design to make the essential change in my own life and so influence/teach others to do the same. I really like what you present and will seek to explore more of these ideas in my own community development activities. Thank you.

    1. 16 January 2015 at 23:10

      Many thanks Alan, here’s to your work.

  4. mke connell
    16 January 2015 at 20:26

    I’ll be very interested in the debate moving forward.

  5. Asun St. Clair
    17 January 2015 at 14:21

    dear Kate. Please keep reminding us and everyone of the fundamental role of the social in thinking and rethinking the future of spaceship earth

    1. 17 January 2015 at 16:11

      Thanks, Asun – and your work too is doing just that!

  6. Nick Gallie
    17 January 2015 at 17:58